Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: B&W 67mm circular polarizer glass filter $84.  (Read 585 times)
fevbusch
Sr. Member
****

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1038


Enjoy every moment of life like it was your last


WWW
« on: August 01, 2010, 06:52:43 AM »

  I'm thinking of buying the b&w for my Pentax 16-45 f4 lens.
   Adorama has it for a good price. Its not the top quality lens. Any comments or criticisms will be
  appreciated.    Freddy
Logged

Freddy
K100D,  Pentax: DA 16-45 f4, DA18-55, DA 50-200, 50mm m 1.7 , DA 40mm 2.8 limited,  FA28-105, Takumar SMC 55mm f1.8,  Sigma 50mm 2.8 EX DG macro, Adobe Photoshop  7, Photoshop elements 9,  Sunpak 383 flash. Fong diffuser [url]http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/freddybusch[/u
calsan
Super Moderator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1451



« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 06:09:22 PM »

Hi Freddy
I read your question before heading out today, so it reminded me to pack a polarizer in my bag!

Well, I hear B+W are the best, however I have Hoya's Pro 1 D polarizers and I'm more than happy with their quality.
The two main things with polarizers is that they:
1. be multi-coated - B+W are sure to be OK here.  [This is important to maintain the image quality of your lens.]
2. don't cause vignetting on your lens - you need to test this out yourself!

Because of this second reason I prefer to try polarizer in a 'physical shop' before buying - particularly for wide angle lenses like the 16-45.  The reason is that they can vignette at the wide settings of your lens.

I took these shots today with the 18-55 and a Hoya Pro 1D.  I 'tuned' the polarizer to make the sky as dark as possible in the Post Office shot.  The shot of the water shows that a good polarizer won't cause flare against the light.  The tree shot shows the polariser at maximum effect and then rotated to minimum effect.
Cheers!
Cal   Smiley Smiley

* _IGP6010.jpg (199.5 KB - downloaded 11 times.)
* _IGP6011.jpg (186.29 KB - downloaded 12 times.)
* _IGP6063.jpg (191.26 KB - downloaded 11 times.)
* _IGP6064.jpg (308.89 KB - downloaded 8 times.)
* _IGP6065.jpg (295.25 KB - downloaded 8 times.)
Logged

Calum
Mike Pearson
Administrator
Elite Member
*

Rating: 13
Online Online

Posts: 4663



WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2010, 09:19:57 AM »

Very good examples Cal - I just checked my circular polarizer and it is a Hoya "Super Quality" 67mm.

Package says "it has seven layers of multicoating applied to the rear surface to eliminate image ghosting. This is a low profile (just 5mm) making it ideal for use with wide-angle zoom lenses."

So far I've had absolutely no problems with mine on the 16-45.

Mike
Logged

K20D, K100D, Optio RZ10, Optio M50, MZ6, FA 28-105 AL IF, FA 50 f/1.4, DA 35 f/2.8 Limited, DA 70 f/2.4 Limited, DA 16-45 ED, DA 50-200 ED, DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED, Sigma 105 f/2.8 EX Macro, Pentax AF-360FGZ, AF-540FGZ.
fevbusch
Sr. Member
****

Rating: 4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1038


Enjoy every moment of life like it was your last


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2010, 12:15:28 AM »

Mike, I got just the answer I wanted.  Someone who has the 16-45 (you) and says
  he doesn't have any problems with it.
  So, I'm buying the $94. thin super quality multi coated 67mm hoya that you have.
  Just want to see if I can get it cheaper then $94.   Have to shop around.
   P.S.  Don't worry, I KNOW you're not guaranteeing the lens.  Who knows, what works on one
 camera might not work on another.
      Thanks for your help.    Freddy
Logged

Freddy
K100D,  Pentax: DA 16-45 f4, DA18-55, DA 50-200, 50mm m 1.7 , DA 40mm 2.8 limited,  FA28-105, Takumar SMC 55mm f1.8,  Sigma 50mm 2.8 EX DG macro, Adobe Photoshop  7, Photoshop elements 9,  Sunpak 383 flash. Fong diffuser [url]http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/freddybusch[/u
Mike Pearson
Administrator
Elite Member
*

Rating: 13
Online Online

Posts: 4663



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2010, 12:28:40 AM »

Freddy - I forgot to mention that like anything else good it is expensive - hey but well worth it  Wink

Mike
Logged

K20D, K100D, Optio RZ10, Optio M50, MZ6, FA 28-105 AL IF, FA 50 f/1.4, DA 35 f/2.8 Limited, DA 70 f/2.4 Limited, DA 16-45 ED, DA 50-200 ED, DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED, Sigma 105 f/2.8 EX Macro, Pentax AF-360FGZ, AF-540FGZ.
calsan
Super Moderator
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 1451



« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2010, 08:24:06 AM »

Freddy - I forgot to mention that like anything else good it is expensive - hey but well worth it  Wink

Mike
2nd this - I paid more for my polariser than the lens in the examples above.  Always have to laugh when I see $5 polarisers listed on ebay being supposedly for the FA31 limited.  What a disaster to combine a cheap polariser with the best lens!!!
Logged

Calum
Ron Kruger
Contest Winner
Sr. Member
*

Rating: 12
Online Online

Posts: 2139


Outdoor writer/photographer for over 30 years.


« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2010, 02:32:19 AM »

I have both Hoya Pro 1D and BW polorizers. They both seem to be fine for mid-range CPs, though Hoya may be slightly better. Since they own Pentax, I suspect their filters are a better match for Pentax lenses, though I'm just guessing.
The first Hoya I bought was for the 18-55 kit lens. Like Calsan, I bought it to improve the optics, and like him, I think one of the dumbest things someone can do is screw a cheap piece of glass in front of a good lens. I don't use the kit lens anymore, but the Hoya fits on one of my regular lenses.
You do get what you pay for. I wish I could afford even better polorizers and a Lee GND kit. Some day...
Logged

In the end, the only things that matter are the people we help and the people we hurt.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal 1.0 RC1 | © 2005-2010 BlocWeb